Last updated: — 111 articles tracked — Litigation ongoing — Stonewall Pride flag settlement secured — Third Circuit stay on President's House changes in effect
News & Press Coverage

Tracking the Censorship of America's National Parks

A chronological record of reporting on Executive Order 14253, Secretary's Order 3431, and the ongoing campaign to remove signs, exhibits, and publications from National Park Service sites.

874Items Flagged
100+Parks Affected
3Active Lawsuits
2Court-Ordered Restorations

Key Background

Executive Order 14253

Signed March 27, 2025, directing the DOI to ensure park sites do not contain content that "inappropriately disparages Americans past or living, including persons living in colonial times."

Secretary's Order 3431

Issued May 20, 2025 by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, implementing the EO by requiring park staff to review all interpretive content and post feedback signs asking visitors to report "negative" information.

The Leaked Database

On March 2, 2026, a whistleblower published the internal NPS database — 879 entries of flagged signs, films, brochures, and exhibits across hundreds of parks.

Lawsuits

Three active federal lawsuits: NPCA coalition (SO 3431), City of Philadelphia (Independence Hall), and Sierra Club (FOIA). The Gilbert Baker Foundation lawsuit (Stonewall Pride flag) was settled on April 13, 2026, with the flag permanently restored.

Topic:
Month: Source:

2026

Jun 10
2026
ABC News / Associated PressPublic Backlash

A Trump Order Asked National Park Visitors to Flag 'Negative' Historical Info. They Had Other Ideas

An Associated Press analysis (by reporters Jack Dura and Mead Gruver) of the roughly 35,000 public comments submitted via Interior's QR-code feedback program in the second half of 2025 finds that more than half were a coordinated backlash against the effort itself rather than reports of "negative" content. A visitor to Theodore Roosevelt National Park wrote, "Trying to erase history doesn't mean it didn't still happen," while another called the snitch-line "un-American." The watchdog group Save Our Signs has documented at least 59 signs removed or modified — covering slavery, climate change, women's rights and Native American history — and the comments surfaced only through the Sierra Club's FOIA lawsuit. An Interior spokesperson maintained that "in many cases across the system, flagged materials remain unchanged."

Read at ABC News →
Jun 9
2026
Associated Press / Daily GazettePublic Pushback

A Trump order asked national park visitors to flag 'negative' historical info. They had other ideas

Out of 35,000 public comments submitted via the National Park Service's QR code feedback system from June 2025 to January 2026, only 14 comments actually called for removals in the manner the administration intended. More than half of comments showed signs of coordination and were critical of the censorship effort itself, with many decrying the administration's push to reduce staffing and defund parks.

Read at Associated Press / Daily Gazette →
Jun 9
2026
National Parks TravelerPublic Opposition

Visitors Use Interior's QR Code System To Undermine Efforts To Remove Park Signage

An analysis from the Center for Western Priorities found that only 0.1 percent of comments submitted through the National Park Service's QR code system were used to flag signs for removal as intended. Instead, nearly 28 percent expressed general opposition to the executive order, while many others showed support for parks and made jokes about the government's efforts.

Read at National Parks Traveler →
Jun 8
2026
The Panorama (SHEAR)Historians' Tracker

NPS To Remove Quotes From Bunker Hill Monument

The Society for Historians of the Early American Republic (SHEAR)'s journal The Panorama logs the Bunker Hill Monument removals as a new entry in its Early Republic Tracker, an academic ledger of federal-government edits to historical interpretation. The post catalogs the National Park Service's plan to pull panels addressing abolition, suffrage and immigration, citing the Washington Post and WBUR reporting, and links to Sen. Ed Markey's X thread displaying photographs of each targeted quote. The Panorama frames Interior's "routine exhibit refresh" rationale as continuous with the administration's broader campaign to eliminate interpretive content deemed to promote "improper ideology" at historical sites and museums.

Read at The Panorama →
Jun 8
2026
National Parks TravelerBunker Hill

Quotes Related To Slavery And Immigration To Be Removed From Bunker Hill

National Parks Traveler reports that three quotes will be removed from the Bunker Hill Lodge at Boston National Historical Park after a visitor flagged a women's-suffrage panel for review. While the flagged suffrage quote remains, NPS instead targeted a 1925 Bunker Hill Day Address by Black civil-rights activist William Monroe Trotter declaring "Colored Americans were here that day fighting with other patriots," alongside the 1846 abolitionist quote and an 1875 defense of immigrants. The piece reiterates the removals stem from the March 2025 executive order "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" implemented through SO 3431, and notes Sen. Ed Markey publicly posted images of all three targeted panels.

Read at National Parks Traveler →
Jun 6
2026
GBH News (Boston)Bunker Hill

National Park Service Intends to Remove Selected Quotes from Bunker Hill Monument

Boston's PBS/NPR affiliate GBH News reports that the National Park Service plans to remove three interpretive panels at the Bunker Hill Monument in Charlestown, including a 1971 editorial by Vietnam Veterans Against the War, an 1846 abolitionist letter to The Liberator, and an 1875 defense of Irish immigrants from the Boston Pilot. The Interior Department defended the decision as a "routine exhibit refresh," while Sen. Ed Markey and Gov. Maura Healey condemned the move as censorship just 11 days before the 251st anniversary of the battle on June 17.

Read at GBH News →
Jun 5
2026
NBC BostonBunker Hill

National Park Service Orders Removal of Quotes from Boston's Bunker Hill Monument

NBC10 Boston's Thea DiGiammerino documents the bipartisan political reaction to the removal order, including Sen. Ed Markey's X post sharing photos of the targeted panels and Gov. Maura Healey's formal statement framing the action as an attempt to "erase voices and perspectives from one of our nation's most important historic sites." An Interior Department spokesperson dismisses the criticism as "tired," calling the changes a "routine exhibit refresh." The report ties the order back to SO 3431 and the March 2025 "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" executive order.

Read at NBC Boston →
Jun 5
2026
ARTnewsCultural Censorship

National Park Service Orders Removal of Quotes at Bunker Hill After Visitor Complains of 'Woke' Ideology

Art-world outlet ARTnews covers the Bunker Hill removal through a museums-and-curation lens, with reporter Harrison Jacobs noting the irony that the women's-suffrage quote that triggered the visitor complaint was not ordered removed. Instead, three different panels were targeted: a 1971 Vietnam-veterans editorial against memorials to death, an 1846 letter to The Liberator indicting Bunker Hill as "silent, bitter mockery" of slavery, and an 1875 Boston newspaper defense of immigrant patriotism. The piece situates the order within Trump's broader executive-order campaign against the Smithsonian and National Park Service.

Read at ARTnews →
Jun 5
2026
NewsweekCumulative Tally

List of Times Trump Administration Has Removed Race, Slavery Plaques

Newsweek's Kate Plummer assembles a running list of plaque, sign and exhibit removals carried out under EO 14253 and SO 3431. The roundup catalogs the new Bunker Hill Monument order, the dismantling of the President's House slavery panels in January 2026 (since reinstated under federal-court order), removal of the Francis G. Newlands racist-legacy sign in the D.C. area, and reported targeting of Harpers Ferry materials related to John Brown's 1859 raid. The article cites a March 2026 letter from 17 U.S. senators demanding answers from Interior.

Read at Newsweek →
Jun 5
2026
ACLU of MassachusettsCivil-Liberties Statement

ACLU of Massachusetts Condemns Removal of Historic Signs at Bunker Hill Monument

The ACLU of Massachusetts issued a press release on June 5, 2026 denouncing the National Park Service's order to take down interpretive panels at the Bunker Hill Monument, including the 1875 Archdiocese of Boston quote affirming that "the citizens of foreign birth take no second place." Traci Griffith, director of the ACLU of Massachusetts Racial Justice Program, called the move a "shameful" and "dangerous" attempt to whitewash history and tied the decision to the broader Trump-administration campaign against statues, plaques and exhibits that grapple with the country's full history. The statement frames the removals as a betrayal of the values being commemorated at the nation's 250th anniversary and demands the order be reversed.

Read at ACLU of Massachusetts →
Jun 5
2026
Boston 25 News (WFXT)Bunker Hill

Historical Quotes to Be Removed from Charlestown's Bunker Hill Monument Amid Controversy

Boston 25 News reporters Christine McCarthy and Frank O'Laughlin document the on-site response at the Bunker Hill Monument after NPS announced it would pull panels addressing slavery, immigration and anti-war sentiment. The story relays Sen. Ed Markey's X posts displaying each targeted quote and Gov. Maura Healey's declaration that Trump "doesn't get to decide which parts of our history are worth remembering." Visitors from the West Coast and Michigan interviewed at the site say the removal amounts to "censorship" and an erasure of a "complicated, diverse" American past.

Read at Boston 25 News →
Jun 5
2026
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)Free-Speech Critique

A Muzzle Award to the National Park Service for Outrageous Censorship at the Bunker Hill Monument

Northeastern University journalism professor Dan Kennedy awards a New England Muzzle to the National Park Service for ordering the removal of three interpretive panels at the Bunker Hill Monument in Boston after a single visitor flagged a women's-suffrage quote as "woke". Kennedy frames the move as part of a "rampage of censorship" by NPS under the second Trump administration, citing prior actions at historic sites in Philadelphia, Georgia and New York. The Muzzle Awards have run annually for 25 years to highlight regional First-Amendment violations.

Read at Media Nation →
Jun 5
2026
WBURRemoval

National Park Service to remove quotes about slavery, immigration and suffrage from Bunker Hill site

Senator Ed Markey posted photos showing that panels with historic quotes related to suffrage, immigration, slavery and anti-war movements at Boston's Bunker Hill Monument are targeted for removal. The panels feature quotes from historic figures sharing their perspectives on the battle at various moments in history, and Markey accused the Trump administration of censorship ahead of America's 250th anniversary celebrations.

Read at WBUR →
Jun 4
2026
Washington PostBunker Hill

Park Service Orders Removal of 'Woke' Quotes at Boston's Bunker Hill Monument

The Washington Post reports the National Park Service has ordered the removal of three interpretive quotes from the Bunker Hill Monument in Charlestown, Boston, in time for the site's 251st anniversary on June 17. The review was triggered when a visitor emailed park staff complaining that a women's-suffrage quote was "woke" feminist ideology. NPS ultimately flagged for removal a 1971 anti-war editorial by Vietnam veterans Arthur Johnson and Bestor Cram, an 1846 letter from G.B. Stebbins in The Liberator attacking American slavery, and an 1875 Boston-newspaper quote praising foreign-born citizens. Emily Thompson, executive director of the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks, told the Post it is "unprecedented" for a single complaint to drive an exhibit change. The piece also notes a federal judge denied the administration's motion to dismiss the broader NPCA censorship lawsuit the same day.

Read at Washington Post →
Jun 4
2026
Boston GlobeBunker Hill

Quotes About Slavery, Immigrants, and War Memorials Slated for Removal from Bunker Hill Historic Site

The Boston Globe details the three quotes the National Park Service has slated for removal from the Bunker Hill Monument's "Bunker Hill Memory" exhibit: an 1846 letter to abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison calling the monument "silent, bitter mockery" of the slaves "guarded by the professed lovers of Liberty"; an 1875 excerpt from The Pilot defending foreign-born citizens; and a 1971 anti-war editorial by Vietnam Veterans Against the War printed in the Globe itself. An Interior Department spokesperson called the changes "a routine exhibit refresh," while NPCA Northeast Regional Director Kristen Sykes said censoring contributions of any people would go "against the very ideals that were fought for at this place." The anniversary of the battle falls on June 17, 1775.

Read at Boston Globe →
Jun 4
2026
WHDH 7News (Boston)Bunker Hill

Censorship Concerns at Bunker Hill Monument

WHDH 7News covers the local response in Charlestown to the National Park Service order pulling three interpretive panels at the Bunker Hill Monument — quotes touching on slavery, immigrants and war memorials — after a single visitor email triggered a wider review. The station relays Interior's framing of the move as "a routine exhibit refresh" against preservationists who call it censorship of a site devoted to public memory. The removals are timed ahead of the monument's 251st anniversary celebration.

Read at WHDH 7News →
Jun 4
2026
The Daily BeastBunker Hill

Trump Accused of Erasing History With War Memorial Update

The Daily Beast frames the Bunker Hill Monument quote removals as the latest example of the Trump administration using Executive Order 14253's mandate to strip material that paints America as "inherently racist, sexist, oppressive, or otherwise irredeemably flawed." The piece recaps the three flagged panels — an 1846 abolitionist letter, an 1875 defense of immigrants, and a 1971 Vietnam-veterans editorial — and amplifies Emily Thompson's warning that letting one visitor's complaint reshape professionally curated exhibits is "scary."

Read at The Daily Beast →
Jun 4
2026
Coalition To Protect America's National ParksNPS-Retiree Coalition

Park Service Orders Removal of 'Woke' Quotes at Boston's Bunker Hill Monument

The Coalition To Protect America's National Parks — a group of more than 2,000 retired, former and current NPS employees — republishes the Washington Post's reporting and amplifies the statement from its own executive director, Emily Thompson, that letting one visitor's complaint drive the removal of three professionally curated panels at the Bunker Hill Monument is "unprecedented." Thompson tells the Post the directive turns the National Park Service's interpretive program into "a feedback loop for whoever yells loudest." The post highlights the targeted 1846 abolitionist letter, 1875 pro-immigrant excerpt, and 1971 Vietnam-veterans editorial, and ties the Bunker Hill order to the broader campaign carried out under EO 14253 and SO 3431.

Read at Coalition To Protect America's National Parks →
Jun 4
2026
Fodor's TravelFOIA Backlash

Trump's National Park 'Snitch Signs' Backfired Spectacularly

Fodor's joins the wave of post-FOIA coverage of the 35,000 public comments the National Park Service released after the Sierra Club's lawsuit. The travel outlet highlights that the so-called "snitch signs" posted under Secretary's Order 3431 generated thousands of submissions defending park rangers, criticizing administration cuts to NPS staffing (roughly 1,000 layoffs tied to DOGE), and demanding a complete telling of American history. The piece notes the acronym "FDT" appears more than 4,000 times across responses collected between June 4, 2025 and January 14, 2026.

Read at Fodor's Travel →
Jun 3
2026
Outside MagazinePublic Backlash

America's National Parks Got a Snitch Hotline. Visitors Used It to Roast the Government Instead.

Owen Clarke reports that the 35,000 comments released by the National Park Service on May 22, 2026 in response to the Sierra Club FOIA lawsuit are overwhelmingly sarcastic, mocking and bitter rejections of Executive Order 14253. Outside found the acronym "FDT" appears more than 4,000 times, and highlights pointed comments from visitors to Grand Canyon National Park, Palo Alto National Battlefield, Joshua Tree, Craters of the Moon, Abraham Lincoln Birthplace, the Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove, Devil's Tower, Alcatraz Island, the César E. Chávez National Monument, and American Memorial Park. The piece notes the comments were collected via QR-code "feedback" signs between June 2025 and January 2026.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Jun 3
2026
NBC Palm SpringsFOIA Backlash

National Park Service Releases 35,700 Public Comments Slapping Trump Administration History Directives

NBC Palm Springs reports the National Park Service took 313 days to process the FOIA release of more than 35,700 comments submitted through the QR-code feedback program rolled out under Secretary's Order 3431. More than 1,700 entries were tied to Colorado's 13 NPS sites, with visitors to the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site, the Amache Japanese Internment Camp, and the Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument defending factual interpretation. An Interior spokesperson dismissed the responses as evidence of "Trump Derangement Syndrome," and the article ties the release to ongoing litigation over the President's House exhibit removal.

Read at NBC Palm Springs →
Jun 2
2026
KUNC / Mountain West News BureauFOIA Backlash

The Trump Administration Asked National Park Visitors to Report Negative Historical Signs. Here's How They Responded

Rachel Cohen of the Mountain West News Bureau analyzes the 35,000 public comments released by the National Park Service in May, finding that nearly 7,000 came from Mountain West parks and the vast majority objected to the administration's attempt to downplay difficult chapters of American history. One Bryce Canyon visitor wrote it was "highly inappropriate" for the NPS to solicit reports of "any signs or other information that are negative about either past or living Americans." Another asked the agency to keep calling the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site a "massacre site," where U.S. Army troops killed about 230 Cheyenne and Arapaho in 1864. Sierra Club Outdoors for All deputy director Gerry James said the responses showed widespread opposition to Trump's review. The Mountain West News Bureau identified only a handful of comments supporting the removals.

Read at KUNC →
Jun 2
2026
Courthouse News ServiceThird Circuit

Trump Fights Washington Slave Exhibit Order at Third Circuit

Jackson Healy reports from Philadelphia federal court on the June 2, 2026 Third Circuit oral arguments in the President's House case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory in den Berken framed the dismantling of the slavery panels as a "curational decision," but Judge Thomas M. Hardiman pressed: "Is the federal government's position that you have the power to eradicate all statements or acknowledgement of slavery at the President's House?" The piece reconstructs the dispute over the 1948 congressional act and the 1950 Independence Mall stewardship agreement, and notes city attorney Anne Taylor's argument that removal of the panels constituted a destruction of property. Trump appointee Judge Peter J. Phipps joined the panel remotely.

Read at Courthouse News →
Jun 2
2026
Pennsylvania Capital-StarAppeals Court

Appeals Court Hears Arguments in Case Over President's House Slavery Exhibit Removal

Ian Karbal reports from the Third Circuit on the City of Philadelphia v. Department of the Interior arguments. Cara McClellan, representing the Avenging the Ancestors Coalition and The Black Journey as amici, told the panel: "The whole point of the site was to tell the story of the nine people who were held in slavery by President George Washington." McClellan emphasized the ramp-up of 250th anniversary tourism, and the article notes that only two of the 11 proposed replacement panels mention the people enslaved at the site. Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory in den Berken argued "omission of particular facts is not stating any falsehoods," while Judge Hardiman probed whether prior cooperative agreements between Philadelphia and the National Park Service implied joint stewardship.

Read at Pennsylvania Capital-Star →
Jun 2
2026
Metro PhiladelphiaAppeals Hearing

Appeals court weighs future of slavery exhibit at President's House

A Third Circuit appeals panel heard oral arguments about the President's House slavery exhibit as Philadelphia prepares for America 250 celebrations. Attorney Cara McClellan, representing the Avenging The Ancestors Coalition, argued that removing discussions of slavery constitutes a major change, not the minor adjustment claimed by the federal government.

Read at Metro Philadelphia →
Jun 2
2026
CBS PhiladelphiaAppeals Hearing

Appeals court to determine fate of slavery exhibit at President's House Site in Philadelphia

A federal appeals court held a hearing on June 2 to determine whether the original President's House slavery exhibit in Philadelphia must be restored. Attorneys for the federal government argued the National Park Service has authority to make changes to the site, while city and advocacy group attorneys argued judges should uphold the February lower court decision requiring full restoration. The hearing marks the latest step in the legal battle over exhibits removed in January by the Trump administration.

Read at CBS Philadelphia →
Jun 2
2026
Philadelphia InquirerCourt Battle

Trump administration and Philly clash in court over President's House slavery exhibit as 250th nears

With just one month until Philadelphia's 250th anniversary celebrations on July 4, attorneys battled before the Third Circuit over whether the federal government had authority to dismantle the President's House slavery panels. A Justice Department attorney said the government has unfettered discretion over which exhibits to display, even suggesting it could eliminate any reference to slavery. The city expects 1.5 million visitors but the history may not be told as the case remains unresolved.

Read at Philadelphia Inquirer →
Jun 2
2026
WHYYAppeals Arguments

Philly slavery exhibit: McCormick joins President's House fight amid court battle

Federal appeals court heard arguments on June 2 in the dispute over the President's House slavery exhibit removal, with the case stemming from the Trump administration's effort to remove exhibits that disparage Americans like George Washington. The city's case hinges on whether the cooperative agreement requires federal approval before changes, while the federal government argues it donated the exhibit to the National Park Service. The exhibit opened in 2010 highlighting nine enslaved people including Ona Judge, who escaped in 1796.

Read at WHYY →
Jun 2
2026
KUNR/Mountain West News BureauPublic Comment Analysis

The Trump administration asked national park visitors to report negative historical signs. Here's how they responded

Analysis of the released public comments found only a handful supporting efforts to revise or remove park information, with most opposing what they viewed as "woke" displays. The Sierra Club is pursuing a lawsuit to access more records about the review, as the agency has not publicly released documents detailing the effort beyond a leaked database published by the Washington Post.

Read at KUNR/Mountain West News Bureau →
Jun 1
2026
KOAA News 5 (Colorado Springs)FOIA Backlash

'Don't Erase History': FOIA Dump Reveals Backlash to National Park QR Code Campaign

KOAA News 5 reports on the 35,700-comment spreadsheet released by the Department of the Interior on May 22, 2026 in response to a July 2025 FOIA request seeking every visitor submission generated by the QR codes posted at NPS sites under Secretary's Order 3431. Rather than flagging "negative" content, the comments overwhelmingly attack the censorship campaign itself, with visitors writing "Don't erase history" and condemning staffing and funding cuts. The story confirms the FOIA dump covers responses received from June 13, 2025 through January 14, 2026.

Read at KOAA News 5 →
Jun 1
2026
National Parks TravelerPress Capacity

National Parks Traveler To Suspend Operations On July 1

Founder and editor-in-chief Kurt Repanshek announces that National Parks Traveler, the only U.S. 501(c)(3) nonprofit newsroom dedicated solely to covering the National Park System, will suspend operations on July 1, 2026 after more than two decades of reporting, citing a lack of capital. The Traveler reached more than 4 million readers and listeners in 2025 across 433 NPS units but draws only about a quarter of the $400,000–$500,000 annual revenue it needs to staff coverage during what Repanshek calls "the most critical time in the history" of the park system. The suspension threatens one of the few outlets consistently tracking SO 3431, the leaked Save-Our-Signs database, and Interior Department management decisions; the organization says it will continue searching for funding through the summer.

Read at National Parks Traveler →
May 30
2026
National Parks TravelerExpert Analysis

Trump Administration's Efforts To Sanitize History Risks National Park Service's Reputation

Former Marsh-Billings-Rockefeller National Historical Park superintendent and historian Rolf Diamant warns that the NPS risks losing its standing as the nation's "unbiased storyteller" after reviewing the leaked internal database showing roughly 800 items flagged for review in approximately 140 of 433 national parks under Secretary Doug Burgum's "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" directive. Diamant highlights examples from Acadia National Park, where waysides on air quality, atmospheric ozone, and the decline of spruce-fir forests were flagged, and from Natchez Trace Parkway, where staff told Interior that Black and Indigenous history deserved deeper interpretation, not less.

Read at National Parks Traveler →
May 28
2026
NewsweekPublic Backlash

National Parks Reporting Program Flooded With Hundreds of Anti-Trump Messages

Jasmine Laws reports that the Department of the Interior's FOIA-released spreadsheet of more than 35,000 comments submitted under Secretarial Order 3431 is dominated by visitors condemning the administration rather than flagging "anti-American" exhibits. One commenter at Manzanar National Historic Site calls it "especially ironic" that the government is asking the public to censor a Japanese-American internment site. An Interior spokesperson tells Newsweek that "in the vast majority of cases across the system, flagged materials remain unchanged" — a claim contradicted by court filings citing dozens of executed removals. The article connects the FOIA release to the President's House exhibit removal in Philadelphia, the Grand Teton massacre marker, and the Stonewall Pride flag dispute.

Read at Newsweek →
May 28
2026
TheTravelVisitor Backlash

U.S. Interior Department's National Park Sign Bans Backfire After Asking Visitors To Snitch On The NPS

The National Park Service published over 35,000 public comments collected through QR code "snitch signs" between June 2025 and January 2026. Most feedback criticized the Trump administration and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum for staffing shortages, sanitization of history, and industrial development across national parks, with many profane remarks aimed at Burgum personally.

Read at TheTravel →
May 27
2026
Philadelphia Inquirer / New York TimesFee Diversion

National Park Entrance Fees Are Funding Trump's D.C. Projects

Maxine Joselow and Andrea Fuller report that the National Park Service is using at least $67 million in park entrance fees to fund President Trump's Washington, D.C. beautification projects ahead of the 250th anniversary of American independence. Nearly $60 million is going to nine ornamental fountains and $7 million to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation. The Center for Western Priorities' Aaron Weiss says Burgum is "determined to divert millions of dollars to projects that President Trump can see out his window" while the park system carries a $23 billion deferred maintenance backlog. A no-bid contract worth $17.4 million for two Lafayette Park fountains went to the same firm building Trump's White House ballroom.

Read at Philadelphia Inquirer →
May 22
2026
Sierra ClubFOIA Release

Sierra Club FOIA Lawsuit Uncovers More Than 35,000 Public Responses Showing Widespread Opposition to Trump Efforts to Censor History in National Parks

The Sierra Club released more than 35,000 comments submitted to the NPS via Executive Order 14253's public feedback system. The records, produced through an ongoing FOIA lawsuit against the Department of the Interior, reveal widespread public opposition to censoring history and science, with many comments also condemning staffing cuts and defunding of parks.

Read at Sierra Club →
May 13
2026
Courthouse News ServiceThird Circuit

Philadelphia Poised to Square Off Against Trump in Third Circuit Over Future of Slavery Exhibit

Courthouse News previews the Third Circuit Court of Appeals oral arguments in the City of Philadelphia's case against the Department of the Interior over the January 22 dismantling of the "Freedom and Slavery in the Making of a New Nation" exhibit at the President's House Site. A three-judge panel — Bush appointee Thomas M. Hardiman, Trump appointee Peter J. Phipps, and Obama appointee L. Felipe Restrepo — was set to hear arguments from city and Interior Department attorneys. The article recounts U.S. District Judge Cynthia M. Rufe's February 16 ruling comparing the administration's conduct to George Orwell's 1984 and quotes her rejection of the government's claim that "the government gets to choose the message it wants to convey."

Read at Courthouse News →
May 13
2026
National Parks TravelerOversight Hearing

Interior Secretary Faces Questions About National Parks At Committee Hearing

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum appeared before the House Natural Resources Committee on May 13, 2026 to defend the administration's FY2027 Interior budget, which would cut roughly one-third of the National Park Service's funding while the agency has lost nearly a quarter of its permanent staff since January 2025. Rep. Sarah Elfreth (MD) pressed Burgum on the new policy invalidating America the Beautiful passes whose holders covered Trump's portrait with a sticker; he refused to reverse course. Rep. Adelita Grijalva (AZ) demanded Burgum protect Quitobaquito Springs from border-wall construction; he declined. Other Democrats challenged the secretary on a no-bid $13.1 million contract to repaint the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and on the broader push to erase history and science under Secretary's Order 3431.

Read at National Parks Traveler →
May 13
2026
Rep. Sarah ElfrethCongressional Hearing

Elfreth Presses Burgum on Federal Workforce Cuts, Partisan National Park Passes & Changes to the Grants Approval Process

Rep. Sarah Elfreth questioned Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on cuts to the NPS workforce, with 20% of Interior staff and 4,000 fewer NPS employees compared to 2024. She also challenged Burgum on Trump's face appearing on park passes and a new grant approval policy requiring secretarial review for all grants above $50,000.

Read at Rep. Sarah Elfreth →
May 12
2026
National Parks TravelerCoalition Letter

Coalition Urges Congress To Press Interior Secretary On Problems Facing National Parks

Ahead of Interior Secretary Doug Burgum's May 13 testimony before the House Natural Resources Committee, the Coalition to Protect America's National Parks — more than 5,000 current, former, and retired NPS employees and volunteers — urged lawmakers to grill the secretary on staffing collapses and the erasure of history and science at park sites. The coalition's letter highlighted removals affecting interpretive content on slavery, climate change, Japanese internment, Native American history, and LGBTQ+ history, and pressed for specific accounting of positions eliminated under Executive Order 14253 and Secretary's Order 3431.

Read at National Parks Traveler →
May 6
2026
ThyBlackMan / Ben JealousOp-Ed

Ona Judge Escaped Slavery. Now Her Story Is Under Attack Again.

Ben Jealous argues that the Trump administration's January 2026 removal of the "Freedom and Slavery in the Making of a New Nation" exhibit at Philadelphia's President's House attempts to erase Ona Judge and the eight other people George Washington enslaved at the site. The op-ed highlights an amicus brief from the African Methodist Episcopal Church and historian Dr. Erica Armstrong Dunbar in the Third Circuit appeal, and notes the role of retired Judge Timothy K. Lewis. Jealous frames the case as a fight over whether the country can tell the truth about its founding ahead of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 2026.

Read at ThyBlackMan →
May 5
2026
American Alliance of MuseumsPreservation

Save Our Signs: Combatting Censorship

Elizabeth Merritt of the AAM Center for the Future of Museums interviews Jenny McBurney, University of Minnesota government publications librarian and co-founder of the Save Our Signs archive. Since launching July 3, 2025, the crowdsourced project has collected over 14,700 photographs from 412 NPS sites documenting interpretive signs before they can be censored under Secretary's Order 3431. McBurney explains how Save Our Signs has expanded to document community responses, including handmade panels Philadelphians installed in the empty spaces left after the President's House exhibit was removed.

Read at American Alliance of Museums →
May 4
2026
Center for Western PrioritiesWebsite Censorship

The Trump administration is erasing history on national park websites

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has expanded censorship beyond physical signs to the National Park Service's 180,000 websites, according to E&E News reporting. Since February 2026, a small group of Interior employees has been pre-screening all new website submissions for compliance with EO 14253, including an article for the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail that removed references to Thomas Jefferson fathering children with Sally Hemings before publication. This centralized review marks a dramatic shift from the NPS's historically decentralized approach where park staff consulted with Tribes and local communities on content.

Read at Center for Western Priorities →
May 3
2026
National Parks TravelerLegislative Pushback

House Members File Brief In Case Aiming To Remove Trump's Face From Park Pass

Reps. Jared Huffman (CA) and Pramila Jayapal (WA) filed a friend-of-the-court brief in early May 2026 supporting the Center for Biological Diversity lawsuit challenging the Interior Department's decision to place President Trump's portrait on the 2026 America the Beautiful nonresident park pass. The brief argues the placement violates the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act of 2004, which requires the pass to feature winning entries from the National Park Foundation's annual photo competition. The lawmakers write that, for the first time, the agency charged with managing the parks has forced visitors to focus on political imagery rather than natural beauty.

Read at National Parks Traveler →
May 2
2026
CNNRemoval

'We are killing them all over again': Critics say history is being erased as Trump reshapes narratives at national parks

CNN examines the scope of sign removals under Executive Order 14253, documenting how at least 45 changes have been carried out according to Save Our Signs. The report includes details from an internal NPS database showing hundreds of displays flagged for review, including signs at Muir Woods on Native American genocide and signs at Fort Sumter about climate-driven sea level rise. Tom Rodgers of the Blackfeet Nation stated officials are erasing the Marias Massacre narrative, saying 'we are killing them all over again.'

Read at CNN →
May 1
2026
E&E News / POLITICOWebsite Lockdown

The Trump administration cracks down on national park websites

Reporter Heather Richards reveals that since February 2026 a small Interior Department digital team has been reviewing every new submission to the National Park Service's 180,000 webpages, vetting content against the administration's history directive. One NPS employee describes the process as a "total lockdown" on information. A Tribally written article on Sacagawea for the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail was scrubbed of references to Thomas Jefferson fathering children with Sally Hemings before posting. Park rangers at Sitka National Historical Park in Alaska also requested removal of an online virtual tour of the Russian Bishop's House after panels mentioning the forced relocation of Alaska Natives were flagged for edits.

Read at E&E News →
Apr 30
2026
National Parks TravelerLegislative Response

UPDATE | Bill Introduced To Halt Removal Of Native American History In National Parks

Representatives Sharice Davids and Dan Goldman introduced the Truth in National Parks Act on April 28, 2026, requiring the NPS to restore materials removed since January 2025 and mandating tribal consultation before future exhibit changes. The bill follows a congressional letter citing removals at Grand Canyon and Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument, and requires restoration within 180 days.

Read at National Parks Traveler →
Apr 29
2026
TheTravelCongressional Bill

Native American Politician's New National Park Rule Proposal Could Stop President Trump's 'Censorship' Of U.S. History

Representatives Sharice Davids and Dan Goldman introduced the Truth in National Parks Act on April 28, 2026, requiring all NPS materials removed since January 20, 2025 to be reinstated and prohibiting future erasure. The bill mandates consultation with Tribal Nations before exhibit changes and calls for a report on co-stewardship agreements between Indigenous communities and federal agencies.

Read at TheTravel →
Apr 28
2026
Rep. Sharice Davids (KS-03)Legislative Pushback

Reps. Davids, Goldman Introduce Bill to Protect Native American Culture Amid Administration's Removal of Historical Content at National Parks

Representatives Sharice Davids and Dan Goldman introduced the Truth in National Parks Act on April 28, 2026, to halt the removal of exhibits about Native American history from national parks. The bill requires restoration of all materials removed since January 20, 2025, mandates tribal consultation before changes, and directs a report on co-stewardship agreements between Indigenous communities and federal agencies.

Read at Rep. Sharice Davids (KS-03) →
Apr 24
2026
Law360Court Filing

National Parks Signage Order Diverts Resources, Court Told

On April 24, 2026, conservation groups filed documents in federal court arguing that Interior Department orders to remove signs about slavery, Indigenous nations, and climate change from national parks have caused them to divert resources and pressured members to self-censor or defy best practices for historical interpretations.

Read at Law360 →
Apr 19
2026
Philadelphia InquirerRemoval

Manipulating the truth at the President's House is not restoration — it's revision

Michael Coard, president of the Avenging the Ancestors Coalition, argues that the National Park Service's proposed digital replacement panels for Philadelphia's President's House site sanitize George Washington's direct involvement in slavery by portraying him as merely "uncomfortable" with the institution. Coard notes Washington personally enslaved 316 people, including nine at the Philadelphia executive mansion, and rejects language in the draft panels suggesting the enslaved had "a modicum of autonomy," writing that "there is no autonomy in enslavement." The op-ed frames the panel redesign as revisionism that undermines the bipartisan effort behind the 2010 memorial and urges NPS to restore the original interpretive content rather than replace it with softened language.

Read at Philadelphia Inquirer →
Apr 16
2026
NPCAAward

The Coalition to Protect America's National Parks Receives NPCA's Marjory Stoneman Douglas Award

The National Parks Conservation Association presented The Coalition to Protect America's National Parks with the 2026 Marjory Stoneman Douglas Award during National Parks Advocacy Week. CPANP joined NPCA last month in filing a lawsuit to halt the administration's efforts to erase history and censor science in America's national parks, and has worked to shed light on the devastating effects of climate change on parks.

Read at NPCA →
Apr 16
2026
Methow Valley News / Writers on the RangeResistance

Writers on the Range: Interior Secretary Doug Burgum Again Ramps Up Assault on Public Land

Aaron Weiss of the Center for Western Priorities connects the FY 2027 Interior budget — which proposes cutting nearly 3,000 National Park Service positions — to the administration's parallel campaign to strip interpretive content from park sites. The column catalogs specific exhibit removals tied to the same policy push, including the enslaved-persons exhibit at Independence National Historical Park, Native American displacement signage at the Grand Canyon, roughly 80 flagged items at the Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail, the Stonewall National Monument Pride flag, climate-science materials at Glacier, and massacre-acknowledgement content at Grand Teton. Weiss argues the staffing cuts and the content purge together constitute a coordinated assault on public-land stewardship.

Read at Methow Valley News →
Apr 15
2026
The TravelRemoval

Interior Department Quietly Posts Proposed Replacement Panels for President's House on NPS Website

The National Park Service posted proposed new signage for Philadelphia's President's House site on its official website, replacing the slavery exhibits removed under a 2025 executive order. The new panels mention nine enslaved people by name but present a more sympathetic portrayal of George Washington's relationship to slavery. The Avenging the Ancestors Coalition called the proposed changes "deeply offensive" and "yet another attempt to distort and censor American history," criticizing NPS for not consulting with community stakeholders. Litigation over the site remains ongoing, with the Third Circuit having affirmed a stay blocking any physical changes during the appeal.

Read at The Travel →
Apr 15
2026
WESA (NPR Pittsburgh) / WHYYReplacement Panels

'Maliciously Outrageous': NPS Reveals Plans to Replace Slavery Exhibit at President's House Site

Reporter Carmen Russell-Sluchansky details the digital renderings of proposed NPS panels for Philadelphia's President's House Site that would significantly reduce references to slavery while emphasizing George Washington's alleged private discomfort with the institution. Civil rights attorney Michael Coard of the Avenging the Ancestors Coalition called the redesign "maliciously outrageous," questioning why Washington's stated reservations should matter when the exhibit is about nine enslaved people who had no autonomy over their own lives. The coverage traces the dispute back to Trump's Executive Order 14253 and its push to remove "negative" portrayals of founders, which has triggered ongoing litigation between Philadelphia and the Department of the Interior over preservation agreements.

Read at WESA →
Apr 14
2026
The TravelRemoval

Interior Department Maintains Online Censorship at Stonewall Despite Pride Flag Settlement

Despite the court settlement restoring the Pride flag at Stonewall National Monument, the NPS website for the site remains heavily censored. Over 100 queer and transgender stories have been removed from the monument's official pages, the word "transgender" has been stripped from most of the site, and the letters "T" and "Q" were deleted from references to the LGBTQ acronym. The digital erasure is part of a broader pattern of online content removal affecting multiple NPS sites, raising questions about whether the flag settlement addresses only the most visible symbol while deeper censorship continues unchecked.

Read at The Travel →
Apr 14
2026
NPRCourt Victory

Months After Removal, Trump Administration Agrees to Let Pride Flag Fly at Stonewall

NPR reports that the federal government agreed to a court settlement allowing the Pride flag to fly permanently at the Stonewall National Monument, alongside the American flag and the NPS flag. The flag was removed in February 2026 under a directive from Trump-appointed NPS Director Jessica Bowron, but community members climbed the fence to rehang it days later, where it has flown ever since. Plaintiffs successfully argued the government's own policy includes an exemption for flags providing "historical context" — the same exemption that allows Confederate flags at Civil War sites like Gettysburg.

Read at NPR →
Apr 13
2026
CNNSettlement Victory

Trump administration agrees to keep Pride flag at Stonewall National Monument

The Trump administration agreed in a court settlement on April 13 to keep the Pride flag at Stonewall National Monument. The administration removed the rainbow LGBTQ flag in February due to a directive about which flags can be flown at national park sites, drawing intense backlash. Lambda Legal called the removal arbitrary and capricious, and the government pledged to restore the important symbol back to where it belongs at the birthplace of the modern LGBTQ rights movement.

Read at CNN →
Apr 13
2026
CBS New YorkFlag Restored

Pride flag at Stonewall National Monument to be restored as Trump administration agrees to settle lawsuit

The Trump administration agreed on April 13 to officially restore the Pride flag removed from Stonewall National Monument in February. The agreement to restore the flag settles a lawsuit brought by several nonprofit groups against Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and the National Park Service. The court agreement says the flag cannot be removed except for normal maintenance and will no longer be subject to political whims. The monument was designated in 2016 as the first in the nation dedicated to LGBTQ+ rights and history.

Read at CBS New York →
Apr 13
2026
Lambda Legal / APCourt Victory

Trump Administration Agrees to Restore Pride Flag at Stonewall National Monument in Court-Enforceable Settlement

The Gilbert Baker Foundation, Village Preservation, and Equality New York secured a court-enforceable settlement requiring the National Park Service to rehang the Pride flag at the Stonewall National Monument within seven days and maintain it permanently. The settlement, announced by Lambda Legal and Washington Litigation Group, resolves the lawsuit filed eight days after NPS removed the flag in February 2026 under a directive from Trump-appointed NPS Director Jessica Bowron. The government acknowledged the flag falls within an existing policy exemption for flags providing historical context. Lambda Legal attorney Karen Loewy called the removal "yet another act by this administration to erase the LGBTQ+ community," while Washington Litigation Group's Alexander Kristofcak declared it "a complete victory."

Read at Lambda Legal →
Apr 13
2026
Washington BladeCourt Victory

Court Orders Pride Flag to Return to Stonewall — Legal Analysis Finds January Memorandum Applied Unlawfully

Reporter Joe Reberkenny details the settlement of the Stonewall Pride flag lawsuit, finding that NPS Director Jessica Bowron's January 21 memorandum restricting flags at national parks was applied unlawfully. The court determined that the Pride flag meets the flag policy's "official purpose" exception due to Stonewall's significance as the birthplace of the modern LGBTQ rights movement, and plaintiffs successfully argued the policy violated the Administrative Procedure Act by bypassing required public input. Lambda Legal's Karen Loewy called the removal "yet another act by this administration to erase the LGBTQ+ community," while Alexander Kristofcak of Washington Litigation Group pledged plaintiffs "will remain vigilant to ensure that the government sticks to the deal." Gilbert Baker Foundation's Charles Beal described the symbol as "restored to the place where it belongs, standing watch over the birthplace of the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement."

Read at Washington Blade →
Apr 10
2026
CBS PhiladelphiaCourt Order

Federal judge rules no changes can be made to slavery exhibits at President's House site in Philadelphia

A federal appeals judge ruled on April 10 that no changes can be made to exhibits about slavery at the President's House in Philadelphia, days after the National Park Service announced "new exhibits" on its website. The judge's ruling ordered that the exhibit remain unchanged as a legal fight continues. The Avenging the Ancestors Coalition condemned the changed exhibits posted online as "an attempt to sanitize history and present a version of the past that is more comfortable, but far less truthful."

Read at CBS Philadelphia →
Apr 10
2026
6abc PhiladelphiaCourt Order

Judge blocks changes to slavery exhibit panels at President's House in the Old City section of Philadelphia

A federal appeals court on April 9, 2026, ordered that the 16 restored panels at the President's House site remain in place and that no changes be made to the exhibit as the legal fight continues. The ruling followed the city's lawsuit over the removal of the slavery exhibit in January 2026.

Read at 6abc Philadelphia →
Apr 10
2026
Philadelphia InquirerCourt Ruling

Third Circuit Affirms Stay on President's House Changes — Administration Cannot Alter Site During Appeal

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the administrative stay blocking the Trump administration from altering the President's House site while the government's appeal proceeds. Circuit Judge Thomas M. Hardiman ruled that no replacement materials may be installed without mutual agreement from the City of Philadelphia. Scholars had criticized NPS-proposed replacement panels for minimizing Washington's role in enslaving nine individuals, including language describing enslaved people as having "a greater modicum of autonomy." Oral arguments on the government's appeal are scheduled for June 2, with Philadelphia's response to the motion to dismiss due May 1.

Read at Philadelphia Inquirer →
Apr 10
2026
WHYY / PBSCourt Ruling

Court Blocks NPS Plans to Replace Slavery Exhibit at President's House with Softened Panels

The federal appeals court issued an injunction preventing NPS from installing proposed replacement panels at the President's House that would have reframed the site's narrative around slavery. The proposed panels emphasized "anti-slavery sentiments" of slave-owning founders, with one stating George Washington "often expressed discomfort with the institution." Civil rights attorney Michael Coard of the Avenging the Ancestors Coalition called the proposed redesign "maliciously outrageous." The ruling preserves the currently restored exhibit while the underlying litigation continues in both the district court and the Third Circuit.

Read at WHYY →
Apr 8
2026
Philadelphia Inquirer / APSanitized Replacement

Trump Administration Posts Sanitized Replacement Panels for President's House — Frames Washington as Reluctant Enslaver

The Trump administration quietly posted digital renderings of 11 proposed replacement panels for the President's House to the NPS website, offering a sharply reframed account of George Washington's role in slavery. One panel describes Washington as "Caught between his private doubts about slavery and his public responsibilities as president" and asserts that people enslaved at the residence experienced "a greater modicum of autonomy than elsewhere in the South." The original panels — which bore titles such as "The Dirty Business of Slavery" and "Life Under Slavery" — documented the lives of nine enslaved individuals, including Ona Judge. City Solicitor Renee Garcia said the federal government never approached Philadelphia about the new panels, in apparent violation of the existing court order barring unilateral changes.

Read at Philadelphia Inquirer →
Apr 8
2026
Society of American ArchivistsProfessional Statement

Society of American Archivists Condemns NPS Censorship as Threat to Historical Record

The Society of American Archivists (SAA) issued a formal statement condemning NPS actions under Trump administration executive orders, which have removed references to contributions of historically marginalized communities — including BIPOC and LGBTQ+ individuals — from park narratives. The SAA declared that archivists have "an obligation and responsibility to ensure that the historical record is not only preserved, but that this information is not distorted, misrepresented, or suppressed." The statement aligned with the Organization of American Historians' position that "historical knowledge is a shared civic resource and a bedrock of accountability," and argued that suppressing factual history undermines public trust and 250 years of American democratic tradition.

Read at SAA →
Apr 8
2026
Sierra ClubState Coalition

Kentucky Coalition of 25+ Organizations Urges State Leaders to Oppose EO 14253 and SO 3431

A coalition of more than 25 Kentucky organizations — led by the Sierra Club Kentucky Chapter — sent a joint letter to Governor Andy Beshear, Kentucky's congressional delegation, and other state leaders urging opposition to Executive Order 14253 and Secretarial Order 3431, "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History." The coalition highlighted specific concerns about historical interpretation at three Kentucky-based park sites: Mammoth Cave National Park (histories of enslaved African American cave guides), Camp Nelson National Monument (Black soldiers and freedom-seeking families), and Cumberland Gap National Historical Park (Indigenous communities). The coalition also pressed the Department of the Interior and the National Park Service to preserve historically grounded interpretation at each site. The signatories include environmental groups, outdoor recreation advocates, historic preservation organizations, and community-based groups.

Read at Sierra Club →
Apr 6
2026
GearJunkieBudget & Layoffs

Trump's 2027 Budget Would Cut NPS Staff, Slash Budgets — 'Visitor-Facing Realignment' Raises Alarms

The Trump administration's FY 2027 budget requests just $2.14 billion for the National Park Service — a $736 million cut (roughly 25%) from the previous year — while the construction budget would be slashed by 72% to less than $50 million. Simultaneously, the Department of the Interior announced a workforce "visitor-facing realignment" that would push remaining employees into public-facing roles, coupled with new voluntary early retirement and deferred resignation programs. The NPS has already lost 20–25% of its workforce since January 2025 through pressured resignations and early retirements. Conservation groups called the combined budget cuts and staffing overhaul "catastrophic" for the agency's 433 sites serving over 323 million annual visitors.

Read at GearJunkie →
Apr 5
2026
The TravelBudget & Censorship

National Park Service Faces 'Catastrophic' Changes Amid History Bans and Employee Cuts

The Trump administration's FY 2027 budget proposal would slash NPS operations funding by $736 million — over 25% — while the agency simultaneously implements Executive Order 14253 and SO 3431, which direct the removal of signs and exhibits deemed to "disparage" Americans. The NPS has already lost 25% of its workforce (over 4,000 staff) since January 2025 through pressured resignations and early retirements. A Partnership for Public Service survey found 98% of NPS employees reported not trusting government leaders. NPCA budget director John Garder called the combined effect of budget cuts and censorship mandates "catastrophic" for all 430+ national park sites.

Read at The Travel →
Apr 3
2026
NPCABudget & Censorship

NPCA: President's Budget Slashes NPS Funding by Over 25% Amid Ongoing Attacks on Parks

The National Parks Conservation Association issued a major response to the White House's FY 2027 budget proposal, which would cut NPS operations funding by $736 million — over 25% — while slashing the construction budget by 72% to less than $50 million against a $23 billion deferred maintenance backlog. The proposal also includes a $10 billion "Presidential Capital Stewardship Program" for Washington, D.C. projects. NPCA Senior Budget Director John Garder called the cuts "catastrophic," noting that parks have already lost 4,000+ staff (nearly 25% of the workforce) since January 2025, while 26 parks set attendance records and 323 million visits were logged last year. The Historic Preservation Fund would be slashed by 95% and National Heritage Area funding by 87%.

Read at NPCA →
Mar 28
2026
The TravelLegal

Interior Department Says Opponents Are 'Ignoring the Facts'

The Interior Department pushes back on all litigation. NPCA's Alan Spears responds that Americans deserve the truth. The litigation landscape now spans four major federal lawsuits.

Read at The Travel →
Mar 25
2026
Aspen Times / Summit Daily / Vail DailyRegional

Colorado Parks Flag Ute History, Pikas, and Alpine Tundra Signs Under Trump Orders

Multiple Colorado outlets report that at least 10 items across two Colorado national parks have been flagged for review, including a Mesa Verde sign about the Ute people's land dispossession and signs about pikas and high-Alpine tundra at Rocky Mountain National Park. Ute Mountain Ute Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Mark Wing said the flagged historical sign is factually accurate and that any modifications should require tribal consultation, in keeping with the nation-to-nation relationship.

Read at Aspen Times →
Mar 23
2026
CBS NewsTV Feature

CBS Sunday Morning: 'Signs of the Times' — National Feature on NPS Censorship

CBS Sunday Morning airs a national segment featuring retired ranger Lucy Scott at Muir Woods and NPCA's Alan Spears at Independence Hall. Scott describes how her climate science sign was removed despite being factually accurate.

Read at CBS News →
Mar 19
2026
Outside MagazineProject

MissingParkHistory.org Launches — Interactive Map Documents 798+ Flagged Items

Outside profiles MissingParkHistory.org, an interactive map built from the leaked database. Each of 798+ entries includes the original exhibit, the reason it was flagged, and removal status.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Mar 19
2026
Rep. Huffman / NPCACongress

53 House Democrats Push to Block Funding for SO 3431

Led by Rep. Jared Huffman, 53 House Democrats urge appropriators to block all funding for SO 3431 in the FY2027 spending bill. Burgum has failed to respond to any prior congressional inquiries.

Read at Rep. Huffman →
Mar 18
2026
NPCA / NewsweekInjunction

Coalition Files for Preliminary Injunction to Halt All Removals

The NPCA coalition asks a federal judge to halt all sign removals nationwide and require restoration of everything taken down so far.

Read at NPCA →
Mar 18
2026
U.S. Press Freedom TrackerPress Freedom

Interior Department Blacklists SFGate After Critical NPS Coverage

SFGate reveals it has been blacklisted by the DOI after publishing critical coverage of NPS media rules. NPS employees were instructed not to respond to the outlet's inquiries. U.S. Press Freedom Tracker documents the incident.

Read at Press Freedom Tracker →
Mar 15
2026
Sierra ClubFOIA

FOIA Documents: Fish & Wildlife Service Ordered to Censor Indigenous and Climate Materials at 30+ Sites

Sierra Club FOIA documents reveal the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service flagged materials at more than 30 wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries. Flagged content included a headquarters video describing Indigenous peoples as "the first stewards of these lands" and a "Hall of Shame" exhibit about the near-extinction of American bison. Nearly 300 public comments from refuge visitors overwhelmingly opposed changes. At some sites, Interior concluded materials contained only "factual statements" and recommended no action.

Read at Sierra Club →
Mar 11
2026
Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.)Senate Floor Speech

Heinrich on Senate Floor: President Trump is dumbing down our history and cheapening our National Parks. But he will not take our history from us.

On March 11, 2026, Senator Martin Heinrich, ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, led Senate colleagues in floor speeches condemning the Trump administration's efforts to erase history from national parks. Heinrich noted that in his region alone, 46 of 81 flagged submissions were slated for alteration or complete removal.

Read at Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) →
Mar 11
2026
KUER (Utah)Regional

Utah Parks Flagged 37 Items; 78% of Public Opposes Removals

Utah parks alone flagged 37 items. Gulf Islands NPS estimates $42,000+ just to replace signs mentioning 'Gulf of Mexico.'

Read at KUER →
Mar 5
2026
Outside MagazineAnalysis

The Sensitive Topics Being Flagged for Removal from National Parks

Outside reviews the full 879-entry leaked database, breaking down flagged content by topic: slavery, climate change, Indigenous history, LGBTQ+ rights, pollution, and women's history.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Mar 3
2026
The Hill / NPS TravelerCoverage

Leaked Documents Reveal Emmett Till, Climate Science, Children's Booklets Flagged

The Hill and National Parks Traveler detail the leaked database. Flagged items include Emmett Till materials and a children's booklet about Robert E. Lee.

Read at The Hill →
Mar 2
2026
Washington PostLeak

Confidential NPS Database Leaked — Hundreds of Flagged Items Revealed

A whistleblower publishes the full internal NPS censorship database. The Washington Post confirms its authenticity. Staff comments reveal agonized confusion over what constitutes 'disparaging' content.

Read at Washington Post →
Mar 2
2026
Boston GlobeRegional

Lawsuit Challenges NPS Over Content Removal, Including at Lowell

The Boston Globe reports on the coalition lawsuit's impact on New England sites. Lowell NHP stopped showing labor history films. Acadia removed climate and Wabanaki signs. Local museums say they are 'more vulnerable than ever.'

Read at Boston Globe →
Feb 27
2026
NBC PhiladelphiaLegislation

Rep. Boyle Introduces Protecting American History Act

Following the court-ordered exhibit restoration, Rep. Brendan Boyle introduces legislation requiring NPS to restore Independence NHP exactly as it existed on Jan. 21, 2026, and prohibiting changes without Congressional approval.

Read at NBC Philadelphia →
Feb 24
2026
Outside MagazineCongress

17 Democratic Senators Demand Interior Explain NPS Sign Removals

Seventeen senators including Bernie Sanders and Cory Booker demand a full accounting of every sign removed. They set a March 10 response deadline. Interior does not respond.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Feb 23
2026
Seattle's ChildFamilies

National Park History Signs Removed: Why It Matters for Families

Seattle's Child magazine publishes an editorial on why NPS sign removals affect how families teach history. No confirmed removals at Washington State parks yet, but the national pattern is alarming.

Read at Seattle's Child →
Feb 20
2026
NewsweekLegal

Interior Department Hits Back: 'NPCA Isn't Nonpartisan'

DOI fires back, calling Democracy Forward 'funded and run by far-left extremists.' Democracy Forward's CEO responds that erasing history violates federal law.

Read at Newsweek →
Feb 19
2026
Outside MagazineTracker

The Comprehensive List: Every NPS Sign Taken Down or Flagged So Far

Outside publishes the most comprehensive public list of confirmed removals and flagged items across dozens of NPS sites nationwide.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Feb 19
2026
PBS NewsHour / APRestoration

Slavery Exhibit Restored at Independence Mall as Crowds Cheer

NPS workers reinstall the President's House exhibit panels as onlookers applaud. Mayor Parker visits. The administration files for a stay pending appeal.

Read at PBS NewsHour →
Feb 17
2026
Lambda LegalStonewall Suit

Gilbert Baker Foundation Sues Over Stonewall Pride Flag Removal

Lambda Legal sues on behalf of the Gilbert Baker Foundation, noting NPS allows Confederate flags at Gettysburg but bars the Pride flag at Stonewall.

Read at Lambda Legal →
Feb 17
2026
PBS / WHYYCourt Order

Judge Rufe Orders Slavery Exhibit Restored; Cites Orwell's 1984

Judge Cynthia Rufe (George W. Bush appointee) orders restoration of the President's House exhibit. Her 40-page opinion compares the administration to the 'Ministry of Truth' in Orwell's 1984.

Read at PBS →
Feb 17
2026
Democracy Forward / NPCAMajor Lawsuit

NPCA Coalition Files Federal Lawsuit to Declare SO 3431 Unlawful

NPCA, Association of National Park Rangers, Union of Concerned Scientists, and others sue to have SO 3431 declared 'arbitrary and capricious' under the APA.

Read at Democracy Forward →
Feb 17
2026
Democracy ForwardEvidence

Democracy Forward Publishes Detailed Examples of Park Censorship

Detailed accounting of censorship examples accompanying the lawsuit. Includes Independence Hall, Muir Woods, Lowell labor films, Acadia Wabanaki signs, and Death Valley Timbisha Shoshone exhibit.

Read at Democracy Forward →
Feb 10
2026
Washington BladePride Flag

Pride Flag Removed from Stonewall National Monument

NPS removes the Pride flag from Stonewall under a directive from acting Director Bowron. The flag had flown since 2022. Over 20 LGBTQ+ organizations demand restoration. Activists re-raise it on Feb. 13.

Read at Washington Blade →
Feb 10
2026
Newsweek (via SFGate)Media Control

SFGate Reveals New NPS Media Censorship Tool; Former Director Calls It 'Idiotic'

SFGate reports NPS employees must get Washington approval before all communications. Former NPS Director Jonathan Jarvis calls it 'just idiotic' and 'unprecedented.' DOI accuses SFGate of ignoring facts.

Read at Newsweek →
Feb 5
2026
Mississippi Today / Sierra ClubCensorship

NPS Removes, Then Returns Brochures at Medgar Evers Monument — Had Stripped the Word 'Racist'

The Medgar and Myrlie Evers Home National Monument in Mississippi briefly pulled visitor brochures that called Evers' assassin, Byron De La Beckwith, a member of "the racist and segregationist White Citizens' Council." A revised NPS brochure removed the word "racist" and eliminated a reference to Evers lying in a pool of blood after being shot. Following national outcry and a letter from Rep. Bennie Thompson, the original brochures were restored. The monument's superintendent disputed that brochures were ever fully stopped.

Read at Mississippi Today →
Jan 29
2026
Outside MagazineExpansion

NPS Removes Signs at Grand Canyon, Glacier National Parks

Removal orders sent to at least 17 NPS sites in six states. Grand Canyon, Glacier, Little Bighorn, Big Bend, Grand Teton all affected.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Jan 24
2026
Org. of American HistoriansStatement

OAH Condemns Independence Hall Exhibit Removal

The OAH reveals it conducted the 2005 site review that led to the exhibit's creation. Calls the removal a 'fundamental misrepresentation' of the founding era.

Read at Org. of American Historians →
Jan 23
2026
NBC NewsLawsuit

City of Philadelphia Sues the Department of the Interior

Mayor Cherelle Parker files suit the same day the panels come down. Gov. Shapiro says Trump 'picked the wrong city.'

Read at NBC News →
Jan 22
2026
Phila. Inquirer / WaPo / NPRMajor Removal

Slavery Exhibit Torn Down at Independence Hall; Panels Ripped Off with Crowbars

NPS staff dismantle the 'Freedom and Slavery' exhibit at the President's House — the story of nine people enslaved by George Washington. An employee tells the Inquirer he was 'just following my orders.' National and international coverage follows.

Read at Phila. Inquirer →
Jan 18
2026
Resistance RangersAnalysis

Former Rangers Speak Out on Censorship and Public Trust

Resistance Rangers analyzes how SO 3431 and SO 3416 are eroding decades of historical interpretation, citing research showing Americans trust museums more than any other history source.

Read at Resistance Rangers →
Jan 16
2026
Outside MagazinePolicy

MLK Day Removed from National Parks' Fee-Free Days

Outside contributor James Edward Mills writes about the removal of MLK Day and Juneteenth from NPS fee-free days, connecting it to a broader pattern of exclusion.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Jan 15
2026
Sierra ClubLawsuit

Sierra Club Sues Over Sign Removal Secrecy

Sierra Club sues over the administration's refusal to disclose how sign removals are carried out.

Read at Sierra Club →

2025

Dec 17
2025
Outside MagazineCreative

Artist Creates National Parks Pass Stickers to Cover Up Trump's Face

After the 2026 America the Beautiful Pass features Trump's face, a Colorado artist sells stickers to cover it. Center for Biological Diversity sues over the design.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Dec 5
2025
Razorback ReporterRegional

Fort Smith Flagged for 'Gulf of America' Rename; NPS Visitation Declines

Fort Smith asked to rename Gulf of Mexico on a map. NPS visitation declined in 2025 for the first time in five years.

Read at Razorback Reporter →
Nov 26
2025
Outside MagazineOpinion

For Thanksgiving, I Plan to Bring Up the National Park Service Cuts

Outside's articles editor outlines how to discuss NPS cuts at Thanksgiving. NPCA's Brengel notes the proposed $1B cut would mean losing three-quarters of all NPS units.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Nov 19
2025
PanoramaArchival

Save Our Signs Publishes Academic Paper on Crowdsourced Preservation

The Save Our Signs project publishes in the academic journal Panorama, documenting their methodology for preserving NPS signs before removal.

Read at Panorama →
Nov 14
2025
Outside MagazinePoll

Americans Overwhelmingly Dislike NPS Cuts, New Data Shows

NPCA/YouGov poll of 3,000 adults: 78% oppose removing factual materials, 69% oppose the $1B budget cut, 62% oppose further staff cuts, 60% oppose adjacent drilling.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Oct 21
2025
Boston GlobePreservation

Historians and Librarians Race to Save National Park Signs

The Globe profiles the Save Our Signs project and documents removals across New England — Acadia, Cape Cod, and Saugus Iron Works. Shows photos of signs at risk on Cape Cod National Seashore and Roger Williams Memorial.

Read at Boston Globe →
Sep 23
2025
Outside MagazineConfirmed

Signs on Climate Change, Slavery Among First Confirmed Removals

Outside confirms the first wave of sign removals at multiple parks. The Save Our Signs project races to archive signs before they disappear.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Sep 22
2025
NPCAExpansion

NPCA: 'Erasure of History and Science Spreads' Across Parks

NPCA documents spreading removals: Acadia climate signs, Jamaica Bay exhibit, NPS climate webpages for Hawai'i Volcanoes, Lake Mead, and George Washington Parkway all taken down.

Read at NPCA →
Sep 20
2025
Boston Globe / Washington PostNational

National Parks Remove Signs About Climate, Slavery and Japanese Internment

The Boston Globe and Washington Post jointly report the first major wave of confirmed sign removals — climate change at Acadia, enslaved man's photo at Fort Pulaski, and a Jamaica Bay display referencing slavery and Native American massacres.

Read at Boston Globe →
Sep 15
2025
LAist / KQEDCalifornia

As Trump Targets Parks, Advocates Warn California History Is at Stake

LAist and KQED publish an in-depth investigation on California's nine national parks. Manzanar advocates call the review 'a white nationalist effort to erase our history.' Public comments overwhelmingly oppose the removals.

Read at LAist →
Sep 8
2025
Phila. InquirerCoalition

45 Philadelphia Organizations Send Letter Opposing Exhibit Changes

The Preservation Alliance leads 45 Philadelphia organizations — including the Betsy Ross House and PA Abolition Society — in a letter to Burgum opposing changes to Independence Park slavery exhibits.

Read at Phila. Inquirer →
Sep–Dec
2025
Various / NOTUSOngoing

Signs Removed at Acadia, Fort Sumter, Rock Creek — Staff Flagged as 'Factually Accurate'

NOTUS reports confirmed removals at parks where staff explicitly noted the content was historically accurate.

Read at Various →
Jun–Sep
2025
Multiple SourcesInternal

NPS Staff Submit 500+ Items for Review; Removals Begin

Between June and September, park staff submit 500+ items to an internal database. A leaked presentation sets deadlines for 'all inappropriate content' to be 'removed or covered.'

Aug 1
2025
Phila. InquirerPreservation

Philadelphians Race to Preserve Independence Park Exhibits Before It's Too Late

The Inquirer profiles efforts to archive and preserve exhibits — including Faye Anderson's 'President's House.ai' 3D recreation with AI characters of the nine enslaved people. Save Our Signs has collected 3,000+ photos in one month.

Read at Phila. Inquirer →
Jul 28
2025
Phila. InquirerFlagged

Slavery Displays at Independence Park Flagged for Trump Admin's Review

The Inquirer breaks the news that 13 items across six exhibits at the President's House have been flagged. An employee prefaced submissions noting the displays should remain unchanged.

Read at Phila. Inquirer →
Jul 22
2025
SFGateBay Area

SFGate Breaks: Muir Woods Exhibit Removed Under White House Directive

SFGate is first to report the removal of the 'History Under Construction' exhibit at Muir Woods, which highlighted Indigenous history, women's roles, and NPS involvement in eugenics.

Read at SFGate →
Jul 3
2025
Save Our SignsResistance

'Save Our Signs' Crowdsourced Preservation Project Launches

Librarians and data preservation groups launch SaveOurSigns.org on the eve of July 4th, crowdsourcing photos of NPS signs to create a 'people's archive.'

Read at Save Our Signs →
Jun 27
2025
Sierra ClubFOIA

Sierra Club Sues Interior Over Stonewalled FOIA Requests

Sierra Club sues DOI for refusing FOIA requests seeking communications from Burgum and DOGE staff about public lands decisions.

Read at Sierra Club →
Jun 19
2025
Government ExecutiveResistance

Park Visitors Overwhelmingly Oppose Sign Removals; Zero Flag 'Negative' Content

In nearly 200 visitor submissions, not a single person flagged 'negative' content. Visitors implored the administration not to erase history.

Read at Government Executive →
Jun 18
2025
Outside MagazineImplementation

National Parks Told: No Negative Stories About American History

Outside reports on the new feedback signs appearing at NPS sites asking visitors to report 'negative' content about past or present Americans. Coverage highlights the chilling effect on rangers.

Read at Outside Magazine →
Jun 18
2025
Org. of American HistoriansStatement

Organization of American Historians Condemns SO 3431

The OAH calls SO 3431 a 'clear and troubling intrusion into historical integrity' and compares the visitor feedback mechanism to authoritarian tactics.

Read at Org. of American Historians →
Jun 10
2025
NPRImplementation

Leaked Memo: All NPS Sites Must Post Feedback Signs by June 13

Internal memo leaked to NPR requires all park units to post QR code signage encouraging visitors to flag 'negative' content.

Read at NPR →
Jun
2025
Rafu ShimpoCommunity

Feedback Signs Posted at Manzanar; Japanese American Community Sounds Alarm

Feedback signs appear at Manzanar, where 10,000 Japanese Americans were incarcerated. The Japanese American National Museum calls it a campaign to 'suppress historical narratives.'

Read at Rafu Shimpo →
May 20
2025
NPCASecretary's Order

Interior Secretary Burgum Issues Secretary's Order 3431

SO 3431 directs all NPS units to post feedback signs, review all interpretive content, and set deadlines for flagging materials.

Read at NPCA →
Mar 27
2025
White HouseExecutive Order

Trump Signs EO 14253: 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History'

The President directs DOI to review all NPS interpretive materials, targeting content that 'inappropriately disparages Americans past or living.' Singles out Independence Hall ahead of 250th anniversary.

Feb
Early 2025
NBC NewsRemoval

Stonewall Website Quietly Scrubbed of LGBTQ+ References

Before the executive order is signed, the NPS website for Stonewall is altered to remove references to transgender and queer people.

None

Apr 20
2026
U.S. Senate / Markey Resistance

Senators Markey, Blunt Rochester Lead Colleagues in Demanding a Stop to the Use of Taxpayer Funds for Censorship

Seventeen senators led by Edward Markey and Lisa Blunt Rochester called for FY 2027 appropriations language to block taxpayer funding for Secretarial Order 3431, which has triggered the flagging and removal of thousands of interpretive signs and educational materials across the National Park System. The lawmakers cited specific harm at Lowell National Historical Park, Independence National Historical Park, and Muir Woods, where exhibits addressing slavery, Indigenous displacement, and climate change have been altered or pulled.

Read at Source →
Apr 17
2026
CalMatters Removals

We can't 'restore' American history by flagging Native American books

Kerri Malloy, an enrolled Yurok Tribe member and professor at San José State University, details how staff at Redwood National and State Parks flagged Native American books including "California Through Native Eyes" and "We Are the Land" under a Trump administration directive to remove materials deemed insufficiently "uplifting." At least 17 national park sites have been affected. Malloy argues California should use its co-management authority over the jointly managed Redwood parks to push back against the federal censorship campaign targeting Indigenous histories.

Read at Source →
Feb 17
2026
UT Daily Beacon Lawsuit

'Dagger to the heart': Environmental groups file counter suit to Trump executive order

Six environmental organizations, including the National Parks Conservation Association, Association of National Park Rangers, and Union of Concerned Scientists, filed a countersuit through Democracy Forward on February 17, 2026 to halt the implementation of an executive order directing the removal of history and science from national parks. Bill Wade, executive director of the Association of National Park Rangers, called the effort to alter park information "almost like a dagger to the heart" of what park employees do.

Read at Source →
Feb 06
2026
Sierra Club Removals

NPS Plans to Censor Brochures on Murder of Civil Rights Leader

The National Park Service removed brochures at the Medgar & Myrlie Evers Home National Monument in Mississippi to edit out references describing Medgar Evers' killer, Byron De La Beckwith, as racist, and to delete descriptions of Evers "lying in a pool of blood" after his 1963 assassination. The censorship is part of a broader administration initiative that has already stripped slavery signage from Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia and references to climate change and Native American history at multiple other sites.

Read at Source →
Jan 29
2026
U.S. House / Elfreth Resistance

Elfreth, Merkley Introduce Legislation to Prohibit Partisan National Park Passes

Rep. Sarah Elfreth (MD-03) and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced the Prohibit Partisan Park Passes Act (H.R. 7251), which would bar the National Park Service from placing the image of any living political figure on America the Beautiful Passes. The bill responds to the Department of the Interior's January 2026 decision to feature President Trump's photo on the passes, marking the first time a living political figure has appeared on them since their creation under the 2004 Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act.

Read at Source →
Jan 16
2026
U.S. Senate / Merkley Resistance

Ranking Member Merkley Denounces Trump Admin's Partisan Changes to NPS Access for 2026

Sen. Jeff Merkley and 11 Democratic colleagues condemned the Trump administration for eliminating Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Juneteenth as fee-free days at national parks while adding the president's birthday as a new complimentary entry day. The senators also objected to the redesign of America the Beautiful Passes, which replaced images of public lands with photographs of President Trump, calling the changes "a thinly veiled attempt" to use iconic landscapes for political self-promotion.

Read at Source →
Jul 02
2025
AHA / Perspectives Resistance

Remembering What the Parks Forgot

Ryan W. Booth of the Upper Skagit Tribe and Washington State University documents how the National Park Service systematically erased Indigenous presence from park narratives, portraying wilderness as "pristine" while concealing histories of dispossession. He cites the 1910 seizure of half the Blackfeet Reservation to create Glacier National Park and the discovery of centuries-old Indigenous supply caches in North Cascades National Park's alpine areas. The piece argues that current censorship efforts extend a much older pattern of interpretive erasure within the park system.

Read at Source →
Jul 01
2025
GearJunkie The Order

'An Affront to Park Lovers': Senate Narrowly Passes Contentious Reconciliation Bill

The Senate passed the reconciliation bill on a 50-50 vote broken by Vice President JD Vance, cutting $267 million from National Park Service funding while expanding offshore oil and gas drilling and increasing logging on public lands. The bill is projected to raise the federal deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the next decade. While Sen. Mike Lee's proposal to sell 3 million acres of public land was dropped after grassroots opposition, NPCA director Daniel Hart called the remaining provisions "an affront to park lovers near and far."

Read at Source →
Jul 01
2025
NPCA The Order

Senate Bill Slashes Critical Park Staff as Summer Crowds Surge Nationwide

The National Parks Conservation Association warned that the Senate reconciliation bill rescinds $267 million in previously committed Inflation Reduction Act funding for national park staffing at the height of summer season, when 332 million annual visitors put peak demand on the system. The bill compounds a 16% cut to park personnel already imposed by the administration, while mandating increased oil and gas leasing on public lands near areas like Dinosaur National Monument. NPCA emphasized that every federal dollar invested in parks returns up to $15 to nearby communities.

Read at Source →
Jul 01
2025
National Parks Traveler The Order

'Big Ugly Bill' Passes Senate Vote With NPS Cuts

The 940-page reconciliation bill, dubbed the "Big Ugly Bill," passed the Senate on a tie-breaking vote by Vice President JD Vance and includes a $213 million cut to the National Park Service along with a $61 million cut to the broader Department of the Interior. While Sen. Mike Lee's proposal to sell off public lands was stripped from the final version after significant public backlash, the bill still requires opening millions of acres of public lands for oil and gas lease sales and now returns to the House for another vote.

Read at Source →
Jun 18
2025
Organization of American Historians Resistance

OAH Statement in Response to SO 3431 and Censorship of History in NPS

The Organization of American Historians, the largest professional society for scholars of American history, issued a formal statement condemning Secretary's Order 3431 as "a clear and troubling intrusion into the integrity of historical presentation" within the National Park Service. Issued May 20, 2025, SO 3431 directs the NPS to revise educational materials and exhibits to eliminate what it calls "ideological bias," language the OAH says in practice sanitizes complex histories of race, Indigenous peoples, gender, immigration, labor, and the environment. The American Historical Association subsequently endorsed the statement.

Read at Source →
Mar 11
2025
Congress.gov Resistance

S.949 - Protect our Parks Act of 2025

Introduced on March 11, 2025 and referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, the Protect our Parks Act requires the Secretary of the Interior to fully staff all National Park System units to ensure visitor safety, resource protection, and comprehensive maintenance. The bill mandates the reinstatement of any NPS employees who were involuntarily removed between January 20 and February 25, 2025, and preserves the Secretary's authority to continue projects previously authorized under the Great American Outdoors Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act.

Read at Source →
Feb 25
2025
U.S. Senate / Markey Resistance

Senator Markey Decries Trump Admin Cuts to NPS

Sen. Edward Markey condemned the firing of over 1,000 permanent NPS employees and 3,000 U.S. Forest Service workers, compounded by a 5% staffing cut and a hiring freeze that threatens to shutter visitor centers during peak tourism season. Massachusetts, which ranked 11th nationally with $1.3 billion in economic contributions from park visitors in 2024, stands to lose significantly. Markey noted that every federal dollar invested in the NPS generates $15 in local economic activity and pointed to his February 20 vote for a failed 48-52 amendment to reinstate fired conservation staff.

Read at Source →